Ξ Ξ Ξ
Given the persistence of particular and unproven allegations about me, mostly concerning the Occult, collected here are various texts, several written by third-parties, regarding such allegations.
As described in one of the texts:
“[I]n such matters it is purely a question of character; of a personal knowing of a individual extending over a significant period of time. On making one’s own judgment about an individual on the basis of such a personal knowing; with the fair, the cultured, thing to do, if a person does not have such a personal knowing of a individual, is to give that person the benefit of the doubt. It is surely a sign of our modern, as of our past, times that so few in such matters as rumours, hearsay, lies and allegations, give the person who is the subject of, or subjected to such things, the benefit of the doubt.” A Personal Knowing, A Question Of Personal Character
It should be noted that in the matter of authorship of contemporary written or printed material, such as material alleged to be by me, “a primary source would be a text or an item which a person had confirmed they had written, or which two or more accredited forensic linguists were of the opinion, through for a example a comparison with the known works that person had confirmed they had written, that that person had indeed written the text or the item in question. A common fallacy is the assumption that certain published, often printed, material – such as the text of an interview – are primary sources whereas, unless verified by certain means they are secondary sources. Hence, an interview with an individual printed in a newspaper or magazine is a secondary source, often judged to be hearsay, unless and until the interviewee and/or the interviewer affirms (for example in a Court of Law) that it is or was a true and accurate account of what that interviewee said, or, if a recording was made, unless or until that recording has been verified as authentic by the person interviewed and/or verified as untampered with by an agreed expert (for example one appointed by the Police or similar authority) with a history of testimony in Courts of Law.” Myatt And The Convenience Of Conjecture.
Allegations Concerning The Occult
Ξ Ξ Ξ
David Myatt 